|
Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Atlanta, USA |
Performance evaluation with MIT1003 database. The first row are color images, second row are ground truth saliency maps and the last row are proposed model prediction saliency maps.
Left:Performance evaluation with MIT300 database. The first and third column are color images. The second and fourth column are proposed model prediction saliency maps. Right:Performance evaluation with TORONTO database. The first and third column are color images. The second and fourth column are proposed model prediction saliency maps either.
Qualitative saliency prediction results from MIT1003 database with selected different models. The first row is six stimuli images selected from the MIT1003 database. Then follow with Achanta, AIM, HFT, ICL, ITII, SIM, Proposed models, and Ground Truth (GT) saliency prediction result with artificial color for better visualization.
Qualitative saliency prediction results on the SID4VAM dataset with different models. The first row shows six stimuli images selected from the SID4VAM dataset. The rows beneath show the salience prediction results obtained with Achanta, AIM, HFT, ICL, ITII, SIM, and the proposed model, as well as the ground truth (GT) salience, with artificial color for better visualization. The proposed model can be successfully applied to explain the “pop-out” effects in the visual search.
Comparison of the area-under-the-curve (AUC) and PR curves with different thresholds of our method and other state-of-art methods on three benchmark datasets.
Saliency Prediction Based on Multi-Channel Models of Visual Processing.
[Spotlight] Machine Vision and Applications, 2023.
|
Webpage template modified from Richard Zhang.